Archive for November, 2007

Slovenian Bloggers Get A Printed Magazine

blogorola

Here’s something you don’t see that often: blog posts of Slovenian, Croatian, Bosnian and Serbian bloggers, gathered around blog aggregator Blogorola, will be assembled and published in the form of a printed magazine. All included bloggers will be able to actively participate in the editing of the 32-page weekly, which will be freely distributed all around Slovenia. Readers will also be able to subscribe to the printed edition and receive it at home.

The authors’ work will be financially compensated, which will probably sound like El Dorado for many of the participating bloggers, who are used to churning pages upon pages for free. This is another proof of the strength of the blogging scene around these parts of Eastern Europe; of course, one cannot be sure that this initiative will last, especially since printed magazines are struggling to survive everywhere in the world. But sometimes going against the grain pays off.

www.blogorola.com

Google Goes Digg-Like On Search

Google has been testing an interesting new feature which lets users vote search results up or down. It’s a part of Google’s experimental program, and it’s not known when or whether it will ever be implemented in actual Google search results.

This is not a new idea. A search engine called AfterVote (previously called Younanimous) has had this feature for several months, as well as some other interesting ones, like bookmarking, prioritizing, or blocking certain results altogether. It’s a meta search engine, which means that it combines results from Google, Yahoo and Live search; unfortunately, this also means that Google can simply add their ideas to their products and cut them out of the loop. It would be a pity, because AfterVote is one of the most interesting alternative search engines around. Check out a screenshot below:

AfterVote

Google’s new feature is actually quite primitive: vote up, vote down, or suggest an alternative. The screenshot from the official site explains it well:

google digg search

[via Parislemon]

Poor Man’s GPS On The iPhone? Yeah, It’s Called A-GPS

I’m not calling anyone out here, but I hate it when some technology that’s been around for a while is suddenly touted as a new thing in conjunction with the iPhone.

AppleInsider talks about Google’s new feature called My Location, which shows your location on Google Maps by calculating your position based on the mobile base unit you’re currently connected to. It’s a cool feature if GPS is not essential to you, and it could be used as a “poor man’s GPS” on the iPhone, but it’s not new. It’s called Assisted GPS and it’s already incorporated in some GSM phones, for example Nokia N95.

As far as My Location goes, it’s a clever implementation of the same principle. Check out the video presentation below:

Yahoo Ads To Start Polluting PDFs

Soon, many PDFs will feature Yahoo’s dynamic ads; dynamic meaning that the ads can be tailored for a particular audience or rotate, making sure that the same user doesn’t get the same ad twice. The ads will appear in the side panel of the PDF document.

This is the first time that Adobe has allowed dynamic advertisements in its PDF format; on the other hand, it shows Yahoo’s determination to expand their advertising efforts to not-strictly-online media.

For us users, it means just another annoyance, as always.

[via BBC]

They Don’t Even Do This When You Kill People

wire cut offLet me get this straight. If you download something that might turn out to be pirated in France, you will lose the right to use the internet. On the other hand, if you drive recklessly, or too fast in France, which might result in someone’s death or serious injury, you get a fine, or even prison time, but you don’t permanently lose the right to drive; e.i. your driving license. I won’t pretend to be an expert on French traffic laws, but I bet that even if you get caught driving a stolen car, you will still keep your right to drive (after you get out of jail, that is).

So why then is the right to use the internet - in my opinion, one of the most basic and most important human rights today - being revoked to people because of piracy? 90% of my income comes from internet. I entertain myself online. I inform myself online. Perhaps I’m not the average Joe now, but trust me, 10 years from now, I will be. Taking someone’s right to use the internet - forever - is like taking their right to ever again drink tap water. It’s stupid, it’s too harsh, it’s insane.

Now, one can always say the oh-so-often used argument: well, if you want to keep your right to use the internet, don’t pirate stuff. Well, it’s not that simple. By that line of reasoning, you can electrocute people for smoking a joint. Or torture them for stealing pennies from a vending machine.

Piracy is not good. But piracy is not synonymous with file sharing. It’s not the same as BitTorrent. It’s different from P2P. You can’t simply forbid all these things on account of piracy. Bad stuff happens in dark alleys, but you cannot forbid people to meet in dark alleys.

I have to admit that the implications of this new deal between the French government and ISPs aren’t completely clear yet. A person caught pirating will get their account terminated by the ISP; but will they have the right to sign up again through another ISP? Or will the government and ISPs keep some kind of black list and make sure you never use the internet again?

Unfortunately, these are the least of the French internet users’ worries. The issues go far deeper. What about users who don’t know they’re downloading pirated material? What about hackers breaking into WLANs and pirating stuff just to get accounts terminated? Huge companies like Google and Universal can’t agree on what is pirated, how to stop it, how to monitor it, but sure, the little guy has to know all this or else his internet pipe gets cut off. Great idea.

The internet is becoming a place I like less and less each day. William Gibson, in his Sprawl Trilogy, envisioned a sort of an underground internet; a secret network behind a huge wall, not connected to the regular matrix. I hope we don’t have to resort to that in the end.

Google Steals Search Market Share From Competitors

I bet you didn’t see this one coming. According to the latest data from comScore, Google is the top search engine in the US, having grabbed 58.5 percent of the search market, which is an improvement of 1.5% over Google’s score in September. Yahoo is still at second place with 22.9 percent of the market (down 0.8% since Septmeber), while Microsoft’s Live Search is third 9.7% (down 0.6% since September). In absolute numbers, this means that Internet users in the US have conducted 6.1 billion searches through Google and only 2.4 billion through Yahoo in September.

All other things are pretty much equal: Ask.com is still at 4.7%, while Time Warner is at 4.2% (a 0.1% drop since September), which means that Google has snatched another share of the search market from its direct competitors.

Now, I’m sure that no one is surprised to hear that Google is still number one, but it has to be frustrating to the competitors, who are trying hard to catch up, to see their market share slip considerably to the big G. This goes especially for Microsoft who’s put a lot of money and effort into their Live set of services, and Ask whose expensive and still ongoing marketing campaign has yielded little results.

Who Do You Link To?

linkLinking to the source is what us bloggers do, right? However, how exactly do you determine which source is the “right” source? Do you merely link to the site where you first found a news item? Do you link to the sites they linked to? Do you do research and try to find the original source? This is the dilemma that’s been bugging me for the last couple of days.

The thing is, I can make it really easy on myself and just link to wherever I read the news, but is it fair to the other bloggers? What if this site merely wrote a short commentary on someone else’s original story? If you look at Techmeme and how it threads stories, this kind of behavior can completely cut off the original source. If some small blog discovers a story, and then Engadget follows up, and everyone links to Engadget, then Engadget will get the bulk of Techmeme traffic, not the source blog.

So, let’s say we agree that one should always take effort to link to the original source. But things aren’t that simple in this department. Many a time a technology blog will find a mainstream story and find a new, tech-related angle that might make the story even more interesting than the original. In this case, linking to the original source is a bit unfair; especially if I don’t follow this mainstream publication in the first place.

I rarely follow up other stories; I try to do original stories if possible. As far as linking goes, I’m trying to find the original source related to technology and not go further; however, I have a bias towards good commentary and smaller blogs - the big ones are going to get linked to anyway.

I’d like to hear your opinion on this, especially if you’re a blogger! Who do you link to?

PickyPirate - Where Pirates Go To Know

picky pirate logo

I would never, ever, download a bittorrent file off the Internet. However - and I’m speaking hypothetically - if I were downloading insane amounts of videos, music, and warez, I’d like to know not only what’s new, but also what’s good. This is where PickyPirate steps in.

The site is a cross between Metacritic and Mininova/PirateBay. It combines fresh items from these torrent search engines with their grades from the popular review aggregator and creates a nice list of new, highly-rated torrents. It’s categorized, simple to use and easy on the eyes; pity it’s evil.

Since downloading those filthy torrent files is the last thing to cross my mind, I’m certainly not going to bookmark this site and use it daily from now on; I will also make sure to condemn any users that do. Were it not for my high moral standards, I’d probably say that PickyPirate is one of the best and most useful mashups out there; instead, I’m going to add it to the ever-growing list of reasons for the imminent demise of the music/movie industry.

picky pirate

[via TorrentFreak]

Kindle? Are You Kidding?

Amazon KindleOk, the idea is good. Finally, you can get books delivered to an e-book reader wirelessly and effortlessly. But Amazon’s Kindle has so many weak points that I don’t know where to begin (you can read about all the good sides just about everywhere else on the net).

It’s ugly as hell. It has unnecessary buttons. It’s too damn big. You can’t read it in the dark. Its screen is black and white. PDFs are not supported. There’s a web browser, but it’s in experimental stage (I expect a web browser on a device with a screen this big and with a net connection, and I expect it to work perfectly). You only get two fonts to choose from.

But, strike all those. I haven’t held the device in my hands, and my over-the-net impressions aren’t worth all that much. But there’s one thing I seriously don’t get.

It charges for blog subscriptions.

Why on Earth should I pay to read blogs which are free everywhere else? Plus, the blogs get a share of this money, which is probably why they’re all writing raving reviews about the device. Draw your own conclusions. I’ll stick to reading paper books for now, thank you.

WriteSomething - Endless, Senseless Book Strikes Again

ws logo

The folks over at one of the rare Croatian web startups, Grejp, really love their pet projects, although they’re not all designed to bring them cash. One of these is WriteSomething, an endless, senseless, collaborative book project, which lets anyone add anything they like to a neverending book. The result, of course, turns out to be a long string of weird sentences, but that’s the point: it’s strangely addictive to read random thoughts from total strangers.

After a period of downtime, WriteSomething is back, better than ever. It’s still the same old senseless book, and it still doesn’t require registration, but it has a lot more content: while it was active, 93 pages were filled up in English and even more so in Croatian (the entire site is available in both languages).

Despite the simple appearance (the site’s design, project’s mastermind Toni tells me, is simple and book-like on purpose), a myriad of interesting features await beneath the surface. First of all, you can now register, monitor your contributions to the book, as well as add friends and follow their contributions. The site also features real time statistics of visits, which is a cool feature not seen on much more ambitious projects. Finally, the site features IE and Firefox search plugins and an RSS feed for all those in need of a constant flow of senseless information.

writesomething

What’s the point, you may ask? Well, there is none. It’s senseless, but it’s also fun. After seeing dozens upon dozens of news about IPOs and fundings, a simple, unambitious project like this is a breath of fresh air. It can get addictive, though, so try it out at your own peril.

[disclosure: Stan Schroeder is an advisor to Grejp, the company behind WriteSomething]

Site Announcement: Short Vacation

I’ll be taking a small vacation to Berlin in the next couple of days, and the site will not be updated in this time. I’ll be back online on Monday, 19. 11.

In the meantime, I recommend these fine sites for your reading pleasure:

MuhammadSaleem
Mashable
ParisLemon
DeepJiveInterests

Surprise! Having A Keyboard Is Better Than Not Having One!

iKeyboardI guess iPhone’s softcore keyboard, however advanced, can’t match the capabilities of a real keyboard.

In other news, big screens are better than small screens (or no screen at all) and no DRM is better than DRM.

Luckily, the PR machinery is still not strong enough to bend reality.