<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google now owns your RSS feeds</title>
	<link>http://franticindustries.com/2007/05/23/google-now-owns-your-rss-feeds/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: chiropody manchester</title>
		<link>http://franticindustries.com/2007/05/23/google-now-owns-your-rss-feeds/#comment-555034</link>
		<author>chiropody manchester</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://franticindustries.com/2007/05/23/google-now-owns-your-rss-feeds/#comment-555034</guid>
		<description>Excellent ideas here, have emailed my mum so expect a big reply!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent ideas here, have emailed my mum so expect a big reply!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lavenia Strimel</title>
		<link>http://franticindustries.com/2007/05/23/google-now-owns-your-rss-feeds/#comment-500553</link>
		<author>Lavenia Strimel</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 03:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://franticindustries.com/2007/05/23/google-now-owns-your-rss-feeds/#comment-500553</guid>
		<description>It can cut back your offline selling tolls too if you get it concluded decent. Detecting somebody who not only does SEO but does the content initiation and distribution for you as well as keyword research, updating content on your web site and blog, having professionaly written press releases at small costs as observed above is what suits many small occupation proprietors and yet there are some who attempt to do it themselves, they get amazed as they dont have the cognition or the technical sciences to do it rapidly and they abandon. Thank you for this article! I've just learned a really fantastic news blog about &lt;a href="http://aggressivemarketing.info/" rel="nofollow"&gt;real marketing&lt;/A&gt; Seek it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It can cut back your offline selling tolls too if you get it concluded decent. Detecting somebody who not only does SEO but does the content initiation and distribution for you as well as keyword research, updating content on your web site and blog, having professionaly written press releases at small costs as observed above is what suits many small occupation proprietors and yet there are some who attempt to do it themselves, they get amazed as they dont have the cognition or the technical sciences to do it rapidly and they abandon. Thank you for this article! I&#8217;ve just learned a really fantastic news blog about <a href="http://aggressivemarketing.info/" rel="nofollow">real marketing</a> Seek it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Money</title>
		<link>http://franticindustries.com/2007/05/23/google-now-owns-your-rss-feeds/#comment-299745</link>
		<author>Google Money</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://franticindustries.com/2007/05/23/google-now-owns-your-rss-feeds/#comment-299745</guid>
		<description>I comepletly agree with you. It's nice seeing another intellectual online. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I comepletly agree with you. It&#8217;s nice seeing another intellectual online. <img src='http://franticindustries.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ehren Cheung</title>
		<link>http://franticindustries.com/2007/05/23/google-now-owns-your-rss-feeds/#comment-44708</link>
		<author>Ehren Cheung</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 15:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://franticindustries.com/2007/05/23/google-now-owns-your-rss-feeds/#comment-44708</guid>
		<description>Ola, I think Feedburner has plans for (or has already has) ads in the feeds.  Adding Feedburner's ability to track subscribers to Google Analytics wouldn't be a bad thing as well.  RSS feeds are huge factor of sharing content and I am definitely sure Google regards them as another way for them to position ad space using ad sense or the ads that Feedburner has setup (or begun to setup).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ola, I think Feedburner has plans for (or has already has) ads in the feeds.  Adding Feedburner&#8217;s ability to track subscribers to Google Analytics wouldn&#8217;t be a bad thing as well.  RSS feeds are huge factor of sharing content and I am definitely sure Google regards them as another way for them to position ad space using ad sense or the ads that Feedburner has setup (or begun to setup).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DestraLab &#187; Google-Feedburner</title>
		<link>http://franticindustries.com/2007/05/23/google-now-owns-your-rss-feeds/#comment-43477</link>
		<author>DestraLab &#187; Google-Feedburner</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 19:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://franticindustries.com/2007/05/23/google-now-owns-your-rss-feeds/#comment-43477</guid>
		<description>[...] Le indiscrezioni sull&#8217;affare Google-Feedburner vengono confermate, a quanto pare Google acquisterebbe Feedburner per 100 milioni di dollari. [via franticindustries.com] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Le indiscrezioni sull&#8217;affare Google-Feedburner vengono confermate, a quanto pare Google acquisterebbe Feedburner per 100 milioni di dollari. [via franticindustries.com] [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ola</title>
		<link>http://franticindustries.com/2007/05/23/google-now-owns-your-rss-feeds/#comment-43207</link>
		<author>Ola</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 08:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://franticindustries.com/2007/05/23/google-now-owns-your-rss-feeds/#comment-43207</guid>
		<description>Wow, it really is Bubble 2.0! I can only imagine how the talk around the Google campus goes. Doesn't phrases like "we are positioning ourselves for the future" echo from a not so distant past? How on earth are they planning to see a ROI for Feedburner?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, it really is Bubble 2.0! I can only imagine how the talk around the Google campus goes. Doesn&#8217;t phrases like &#8220;we are positioning ourselves for the future&#8221; echo from a not so distant past? How on earth are they planning to see a ROI for Feedburner?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan Schroeder</title>
		<link>http://franticindustries.com/2007/05/23/google-now-owns-your-rss-feeds/#comment-42870</link>
		<author>Stan Schroeder</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 21:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://franticindustries.com/2007/05/23/google-now-owns-your-rss-feeds/#comment-42870</guid>
		<description>@rod: good question, but it's hard to answer it if you don't know the details. For example, one would say that for 6 billion dollars Microsoft could have developed their own ad platform, and yet they chose to spend that money on purchasing aQuantive. 

I'd say that it's a combination of Feedburner's technology being good, perhaps backed with some patents, them already having a big user base, and Feedburner having a really good reputation, that makes it worth the money to Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@rod: good question, but it&#8217;s hard to answer it if you don&#8217;t know the details. For example, one would say that for 6 billion dollars Microsoft could have developed their own ad platform, and yet they chose to spend that money on purchasing aQuantive. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d say that it&#8217;s a combination of Feedburner&#8217;s technology being good, perhaps backed with some patents, them already having a big user base, and Feedburner having a really good reputation, that makes it worth the money to Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rod</title>
		<link>http://franticindustries.com/2007/05/23/google-now-owns-your-rss-feeds/#comment-42827</link>
		<author>rod</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 19:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://franticindustries.com/2007/05/23/google-now-owns-your-rss-feeds/#comment-42827</guid>
		<description>Question: Why didn't Google develop this in house? The market is largely nascent, so they have time to do so (unlike w/ YouTube). I can't imagine that they couldn't pull it off for under 100M.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question: Why didn&#8217;t Google develop this in house? The market is largely nascent, so they have time to do so (unlike w/ YouTube). I can&#8217;t imagine that they couldn&#8217;t pull it off for under 100M.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
