<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digg&#8217;s million users raise many questions</title>
	<link>http://franticindustries.com/2007/03/08/diggs-million-users-raise-many-questions/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Digg at 1 million diggers: Digital media democracy or algorithm rule? &#124; Digital Markets &#124; ZDNet.com</title>
		<link>http://franticindustries.com/2007/03/08/diggs-million-users-raise-many-questions/#comment-42043</link>
		<author>&#187; Digg at 1 million diggers: Digital media democracy or algorithm rule? &#124; Digital Markets &#124; ZDNet.com</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 22:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://franticindustries.com/2007/03/08/diggs-million-users-raise-many-questions/#comment-42043</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Digg&#8217;s million users raise many questions,&#8221; as FranticIndustries underscores:&#160;  As much as Digg&#8217;s value, popularity, traffic and chances to sell for millions has increased, Digg has also been on a steady decline when one of its core strengths is concerned - news. With more users came more submissions, with more submissions came sensationalist titles, and with those all the important news is stuck in traffic&#8230;so they turn to submitting single Flickr images, &#8220;believe it or not&#8221; facts of dubious origin, and old stories that were around before Digg and were never submitted.This has hurt Digg, although perhaps not in the traffic/number of users kind of way. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] &ldquo;Digg&rsquo;s million users raise many questions,&rdquo; as FranticIndustries underscores:&nbsp;  As much as Digg&rsquo;s value, popularity, traffic and chances to sell for millions has increased, Digg has also been on a steady decline when one of its core strengths is concerned - news. With more users came more submissions, with more submissions came sensationalist titles, and with those all the important news is stuck in traffic&hellip;so they turn to submitting single Flickr images, &ldquo;believe it or not&rdquo; facts of dubious origin, and old stories that were around before Digg and were never submitted.This has hurt Digg, although perhaps not in the traffic/number of users kind of way. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://franticindustries.com/2007/03/08/diggs-million-users-raise-many-questions/#comment-11371</link>
		<author>john</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://franticindustries.com/2007/03/08/diggs-million-users-raise-many-questions/#comment-11371</guid>
		<description>The biggest problem with digg is the way users make duplicates of stories. 

So say you submit a big story in which an hour has past and no-one has dugg it then someone else then submits it three hours later they get dugg because more users are online and you don't thats hardly fare.

The problem is they don't have people a digg headquarters, which digg good stories. They need to reward the user for submiting the story better and reward the user by policing the whole site by reporting duplicate storys and reporting spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest problem with digg is the way users make duplicates of stories. </p>
<p>So say you submit a big story in which an hour has past and no-one has dugg it then someone else then submits it three hours later they get dugg because more users are online and you don&#8217;t thats hardly fare.</p>
<p>The problem is they don&#8217;t have people a digg headquarters, which digg good stories. They need to reward the user for submiting the story better and reward the user by policing the whole site by reporting duplicate storys and reporting spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan Schroeder</title>
		<link>http://franticindustries.com/2007/03/08/diggs-million-users-raise-many-questions/#comment-8432</link>
		<author>Stan Schroeder</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 16:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://franticindustries.com/2007/03/08/diggs-million-users-raise-many-questions/#comment-8432</guid>
		<description>@anonymous: there's an analysis of Reddit in the next article, I should have linked to that. But my comment about Reddit was not with a bad intention: I think that most people who visit Reddit would agree that it is more of a social content than a social news site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@anonymous: there&#8217;s an analysis of Reddit in the next article, I should have linked to that. But my comment about Reddit was not with a bad intention: I think that most people who visit Reddit would agree that it is more of a social content than a social news site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anoynmous</title>
		<link>http://franticindustries.com/2007/03/08/diggs-million-users-raise-many-questions/#comment-8415</link>
		<author>anoynmous</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://franticindustries.com/2007/03/08/diggs-million-users-raise-many-questions/#comment-8415</guid>
		<description>Why the subtle knock to Reddit?

Seems a bit uncalled of really. Especially since no evidence at all is sited for any parallels between Reddit and Digg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why the subtle knock to Reddit?</p>
<p>Seems a bit uncalled of really. Especially since no evidence at all is sited for any parallels between Reddit and Digg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gozino</title>
		<link>http://franticindustries.com/2007/03/08/diggs-million-users-raise-many-questions/#comment-8365</link>
		<author>gozino</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 13:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://franticindustries.com/2007/03/08/diggs-million-users-raise-many-questions/#comment-8365</guid>
		<description>The quality of Digg has fallen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The quality of Digg has fallen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charbarred</title>
		<link>http://franticindustries.com/2007/03/08/diggs-million-users-raise-many-questions/#comment-8301</link>
		<author>Charbarred</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 09:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://franticindustries.com/2007/03/08/diggs-million-users-raise-many-questions/#comment-8301</guid>
		<description>It's good news for digg but I guess the hardcore diggers will be the ones to suffer.  it's inevitable that digg will have to dumb down and become the MySpace of news. A lot of the core digg users will probably cry, but what can you do, digg has to pay the bills.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good news for digg but I guess the hardcore diggers will be the ones to suffer.  it&#8217;s inevitable that digg will have to dumb down and become the MySpace of news. A lot of the core digg users will probably cry, but what can you do, digg has to pay the bills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent</title>
		<link>http://franticindustries.com/2007/03/08/diggs-million-users-raise-many-questions/#comment-8077</link>
		<author>Vincent</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://franticindustries.com/2007/03/08/diggs-million-users-raise-many-questions/#comment-8077</guid>
		<description>very insightful. So how can I digg you? :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very insightful. So how can I digg you? :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reddit learns about the importance of editors the hard way - franticindustries.</title>
		<link>http://franticindustries.com/2007/03/08/diggs-million-users-raise-many-questions/#comment-7972</link>
		<author>Reddit learns about the importance of editors the hard way - franticindustries.</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://franticindustries.com/2007/03/08/diggs-million-users-raise-many-questions/#comment-7972</guid>
		<description>[...] Features        &#171; Digg&#8217;s million users raise many questions [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Features        &laquo; Digg&#8217;s million users raise many questions [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kilps</title>
		<link>http://franticindustries.com/2007/03/08/diggs-million-users-raise-many-questions/#comment-7934</link>
		<author>kilps</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://franticindustries.com/2007/03/08/diggs-million-users-raise-many-questions/#comment-7934</guid>
		<description>I agree - Digg still has some great content - but I have been feeling of late that the type of content has been changing :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree - Digg still has some great content - but I have been feeling of late that the type of content has been changing <img src='http://franticindustries.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
