Comments on: Web 2.0 applications vs. desktop applications http://franticindustries.com/2007/03/01/online-applications-vs-desktop-applications/ Sun, 7 Sep 2008 08:33:01 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1 By: Consolidation Debt http://franticindustries.com/2007/03/01/online-applications-vs-desktop-applications/#comment-141168 Consolidation Debt Sun, 06 Jan 2008 09:27:40 +0000 http://franticindustries.com/2007/03/01/online-applications-vs-desktop-applications/#comment-141168 Certainly good view point when it comes to .0 applications vs. desktop applications at franticindustries - web 2.0, social networking, IT technology trends.. Your posts is certainly why I keep check out your blog. Best to you and yours! Certainly good view point when it comes to .0 applications vs. desktop applications at franticindustries - web 2.0, social networking, IT technology trends.. Your posts is certainly why I keep check out your blog. Best to you and yours!

]]> By: Zvi Schreiber http://franticindustries.com/2007/03/01/online-applications-vs-desktop-applications/#comment-21284 Zvi Schreiber Mon, 09 Apr 2007 12:40:25 +0000 http://franticindustries.com/2007/03/01/online-applications-vs-desktop-applications/#comment-21284 I agree with the analysis and think that over time more and more Web 2.0 applications will thrive on many or even all seven of those criteria. However a major limitation of Web 2.0 apps not mentioned is that they do not interoperate with each other - they do not share the same file system, the same desktop or the same single sign-in that applications on the local OS (Windows or Mac) share. That is why we are developing the Global Hosted Operating System G.ho.st (http://G.ho.st) to bring a common desktop, file system and sign-in to the Web 2.0 applications and overcome this important limitation - with a Web OS, the Web 2.0 applications can work with each other and provide a coherent personal computing environment which can start to replace Windows. I agree with the analysis and think that over time more and more Web 2.0 applications will thrive on many or even all seven of those criteria. However a major limitation of Web 2.0 apps not mentioned is that they do not interoperate with each other - they do not share the same file system, the same desktop or the same single sign-in that applications on the local OS (Windows or Mac) share. That is why we are developing the Global Hosted Operating System G.ho.st (http://G.ho.st) to bring a common desktop, file system and sign-in to the Web 2.0 applications and overcome this important limitation - with a Web OS, the Web 2.0 applications can work with each other and provide a coherent personal computing environment which can start to replace Windows.

]]> By: Oren Cohen Shwartz http://franticindustries.com/2007/03/01/online-applications-vs-desktop-applications/#comment-9478 Oren Cohen Shwartz Mon, 12 Mar 2007 22:54:04 +0000 http://franticindustries.com/2007/03/01/online-applications-vs-desktop-applications/#comment-9478 An article about this topic: A Software Architecture Toolset for Choosing the Right Type of Client Application Choose "web application" or "desktop application"? Rich-Internet or a Smart-Client Application? http://www.codeguru.com/csharp/csharp/cs_misc/designtechniques/article.php/c13369/ by Oren Cohen Shwartz An article about this topic:
A Software Architecture Toolset for Choosing the Right Type of Client Application
Choose “web application” or “desktop application”? Rich-Internet or a Smart-Client Application?

http://www.codeguru.com/csharp/csharp/cs_misc/designtechniques/article.php/c13369/
by Oren Cohen Shwartz

]]> By: info bunny » Blog Archive » Web 2.0 applications vs. desktop applications http://franticindustries.com/2007/03/01/online-applications-vs-desktop-applications/#comment-6849 info bunny » Blog Archive » Web 2.0 applications vs. desktop applications Sun, 04 Mar 2007 00:28:37 +0000 http://franticindustries.com/2007/03/01/online-applications-vs-desktop-applications/#comment-6849 [...] Link [...] […] Link […]

]]>