Goodbye email, it’s time to move on.

From the perspective of many users, email is still a pretty useful and reliable service. But looking at all email traffic, we understand that what we call “email” is actually a tiny part of a huge network of zombie computers designed with one goal: to forcefully advertise products to unwilling recipients.

According to the latest reports, 94% of e-mail in December was spam.

Think about it. If your phone rang a hundred times a day, and only 6 calls were actual calls and not people trying to sell you stuff you don’t need, would you use it? Would you invent clever ways to recognize fake calls and only answer the real ones, or would you give up and move to another way of communicating?

Sure, we do have clever spam filters which make email bearable for us. We don’t notice the 94% of spam - we’re smart and we know how to recognize what’s good and what’s useless. But aren’t we wasting time with it? Email isn’t particularly fast. It’s not even particularly versatile. It’s not secure. It’s not good for sending large files. Why do we use it, then?

Well, since it’s embedded into the Internet on the protocol level, it’s still universally considered two things: reliable and official. Unfortunately, the first argument doesn’t really stand anymore, while the second is only in our minds. How can something be reliable if 94% of it is crap? Email is usually delivered, but even this is not a given. Emails can be faked, addresses spoofed, they can be delayed, the mail server can die and the messages may never reach the destination. Can you imagine a service that has the same level of reliability, or even better? Plenty. Most P2P networks are just as reliable.

Lastly, email is only considered “official” because we think of it that way. A usual conversation in the office starts with “Hey can you…” and ends with “OK, just send me an official email”. Why not an IM? Well, because it’s not official then. I fail to see the difference. But nevermind - even if we keep on thinking of email as the official way of internet communication, this doesn’t stop us at trying new methods. Instant messaging was accepted well; some other service in the future might also be accepted well.

So, what’s my alternative? Web 2.0. It’s about two important things - moving to the Web as a platform, and social networking. This means that we’re not bound to use old Internet protocols. And it means that we are enabled to communicate in many different ways. By its definition, it will make email obsolete.

Should we completely leave email behind? No. It still offers a way to identify yourself. It can be faked, yes, but it does give you a vast amount of credibility over being simply anonymous on the web. That’s why almost all Web 2.0 services require an email for registration. I’ve got an email address pointed out on this site, but it’s not for communication. It’s for identification and initializing communication. If I really want to communicate with someone, I use Meebo. Or Campfire. Email is good for letting me know that you exist, but it sucks for communication. But, I won’t stand in your way. If you like, you can still keep using email. It’s going to be you, 5 of your friends and 94 spammers in a small room. I’m moving on to something better.

14 Responses to “Goodbye email, it’s time to move on.”

  1. Suresh Says:

    As much as most of the email one receives is spam, it is still an indispensable tool for communication right now. Probably in the future, say a couple of years from today, we can forget email, but as of today email is the best tool for communication.

  2. Melianor Says:

    Look at the reliable and official factor a different way. What is written and can if needed be printed out on a paper is what still most literate humankind consider reliable and official, since if needed you have physical proof, though that can be faked too, still its more reliable and official than other ways seem, since paper has been used in that way for ages. Like your legal documents, passport, birth certificate and so forth.

    In my personal view i would only consider IM reliable and official, if i would be logging the information, be that speech or text, though this is strictly speaking when concerned with business. Private matters are different. Here i already mostly use IM and other Tools, like (Google) Calendar.

    I think its simply fact that its very hard to abolish or change those interpretations that are linked to what is reliable and official or simply real. Insofar, disregarding all the spam i think email will still linger around.

    I liked the way you pointed out, that email is mainly used for identification throughout the internet these days.

  3. Amanda Says:

    Check out the new embedded version of Kool IM.

    www.koolim.com

  4. سكس Says:

    sry i just know how to write my name in arabic :)) anyway however in arabic when i read some thing like that i just say “raee” i donot know how to say it in english . thanks

  5. طيز Says:

    sry i just know how to write my name in arabic :)) anyway however my english not that good but i think i get the point. thanks

  6. جنس Says:

    sry i just know how to write my name in arabic :)) anyway however my english not that good but i think i get the point. thanks

  7. Industrial Magazine Says:

    Industrial Magazine…

    Unbelievable New Technology! A must see!…

  8. Get Your Ex Back Says:

    I read your posts for a long time and must tell you that your posts always prove to be of a high value and quality for readers.

  9. stottettake Says:

    This is quite a hot information. I’ll share it on Twitter.

  10. Vince Delmonte Says:

    If you want to see a reader’s feedback :) , I rate this post for 4/5. Decent info, but I just have to go to that damn yahoo to find the missed parts. Thanks, anyway!

  11. technology selling Says:

    technology selling…

    I soon discovered what this means. The device is heavier and features a revamped user- interface which is different from previous versions, apparently for no good reasons. It somehow feels slower too, although I can’ t really point out why that is. W…

  12. satellite TV Says:

    satellite TV…

    I do see technology as a service response because it makes it possible for the public library to serve readers it could not serve before: blind and low- vision people and other users with disabilities. Assistive technology has opened up the world of li…

  13. Karen S. Says:

    I really enjoyed this post. I will definitely check back later for more informative posts from you. Thanks!

  14. Satellite TV Says:

    I have to say that your blog is pretty cool. If you could add a few more videos I would really appreciate it!

Leave a Reply